The Appellate Tribunal granted the respondent a final opportunity to file a written synopsis due to absence of counsel and listed the matter for 28th August, 2017.
Time granted for filing written synopsis. Matter listed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
FPA-57/DLI/2002
Gulshan Kumar … Appellant
Versus
The Competent Authority, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Kawaljit Singh, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Mr. D.S. Disht, Joint Commissioner |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 11.05.2017
FPA-57/DLI/2002
Mr. D.S. Bisht, Joint Commissioner appears on behalf of the respondent and submits that the department has engaged a new counsel. He is not available today. He seeks one final opportunity to file the written synopsis.
Let the written synopsis be filed within four weeks.
List on 28th August, 2017
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member (B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 11th May, 2017
‘s’
FPA-57/DLI/2002
Page 1 of 1
Gulshan Kumar
The Competent Authority, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
