FPA-45/MUM/2017 of Mr. Shailesh H. Negandhi v/s The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Case brief
What is this about?
This is a one-line listing order with no substantive disposition or reasoning provided.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY NEW DELHI
(Under Section 12 of SAFEMA, 1976 as Amended by Finance Act, 2016)
FPA-45/MUM/2017
Mr. Shailesh H. Negandhi … Applicant/Appellant Versus The Competent Authority, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Kiran Jain, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Stanly Joseph, I.O.
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER
ORDER
28.04.2017
FPA-45/MUM/2017
List on 10th July, 2017.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Shri Kiran Jain
- respondent
The Competent Authority, Mumbai
Coram
Manmohan Singh
All orders in this case
10 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court