This order deals with an appeal regarding forfeiture property. The tribunal fixed a monthly rental deposit of Rs. 70,000 based on objections to a higher valuation. The case was adjourned for final hearing.
Rental deposit of Rs. 70,000 per month fixed; appeal listed for final hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL FOR FORFEITED PROPERTY AT NEW DELHI
MP-112/DLI/2016(Addl. Doc) MP-111/DLI/2016 (Stay) FPA-41/DLI/2016
Rajesh Verma … Appellant Versus The Competent Authority, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Munish Kumar, Advocate Sh. D.S Bisht, Joint Commissioner |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 23.02.2017
FPA-41/DLI/2016
Valuation report has been filed by the respondent. It is taken on record. It is stated that the market rent of the said property is Rs.1 lakh 12 thousand. On the other hand Mr. Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate counsel for the appellant submits that the market rent of the said property is less than Rs. 70 thousands. It is a residential property and any part of the property is not used for commercial purpose. There are two versions given y the parties.
We are of the view that the appeal is expatiated. The order has already passed to deposit of sum of Rs. 70,000/-(Seventy thousand) per month as the
FPA-41/DLI/2016
Page 1 of 2
rental charge for the said property may continue till the disposal of the appeal. The order is passed accordingly. The appellant shall keep on depositing the said amount already fixed during the pendency of appeal.
List the appeal as well as pending application for final hearing on 20th April, 2017.
Both the parties may file the written submission on or before the next date of hearing.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal)
Member
New Delhi,
23rd February, 2017
‘s’
FPA-41/DLI/2016
Page 2 of 2
1 issue framed by the court
Whether to fix the rental charge for the property during the pendency of the appeal.
Rajesh Verma
The Competent Authority, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
