FP-PMLA-945/CHN/2015 of B. Nirmala v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Case brief
What is this about?
The tribunal listed the admission of adjournment order for arguments. Both parties were allowed to file written synopses within one week.
What the court decided
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2147/CHN/2015 (A.D.) MP-PMLA-1817/CHN/2015 (Stay)
FP-PMLA-945/CHN/2015
B. Nirmala … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | Shri Romil Pathak, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent |
: | Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : | CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : | MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : | MEMBER |
ORDER 06.02.2017
FP-PMLA-945/CHN/2015 & MP-PMLA-1817/CHN/2015 (Stay)
Rejoinder has not been filed. The counsel for the appellant says that
Parties & counsel
- appellant
B. Nirmala
- respondent
Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Coram
Manmohan Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · February
- Case no.
- FP-PMLA-945/CHN/2015
- Topic
- Money Laundering
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1
- Order 2 — this page
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court