The tribunal adjourned the hearing due to counsel unavailability and imposed a Rs. 5,000 cost on the appellant to appear on 20th March, 2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1846/HYD/2015 (U/s 35) MP-PMLA-1847/HYD/2015 (Mics) &
FPA-PMLA-989/HYD/2015
M/s Nava Bharat Project Ltd. .… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad .… Respondent no. 1
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Sh. Arshdeep Singh, Advocate. Sh. Manish Jha, Advocate. For the respondent no. 1 : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 07.12.2016
FPA-PMLA-989/HYD/2015
Adjournment is sought as arguing counsel is not available in the present case. The request is opposed by the counsel for the respondent in the interest of the justice, it is adjourned subject to payment of the cost of Rs. 5,000/- to the learned counsel for the respondent.
List on 20th March, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 7th December, 2016.
‘K’
FPA-PMLA-989/HYD/2015
Page 1 of 1
M/s Nava Bharat Project Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Justice Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
21 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
