The Tribunal allowed an appellant's application to file an additional affidavit in a money laundering appeal without any opposition.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEYLAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2338/KOL/2016(Mics) MP-PMLA-1879/KOL/2015 (Stay) &
FPA-PMLA-980/KOL/2015
Shankar Paul … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Amit Sharma, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER 24.11.2016
MP-PMLA-2338/KOL/2016(Mics)
Reply has not been filed. This is an application filed by the appellant permitting him to take additional affidavit dated 30th November, 2015 in application no. MP-PMLA-2338/KOL/2016 (Mics). The prayer is not opposed by the counsel for the respondent. The same is allowed in the main appeal. Reply if any be filed within six weeks and rejoinder be filed thereafter.
List on 30th March, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 24th November, 2016 ‘K’
FPA-PMLA-980/KOL/2015 Page 1 of 1
Shankar Paul
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
