The Tribunal noted that the reply was not filed by the respondent and respondent no. 2 was unserved. It stayed the impugned order of 31 August 2015 pending the hearing and listed the matter.
The operation of the impugned order dated 31st August, 2015 is stayed till the next date of hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2044/MUM/2015 (Stay)
&
FPA-PMLA-937/MUM/2015
Nilesh J. Thakur
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Arjun Krishnan, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate on behalf of Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
24.11.2016
MP-PMLA-2044/MUM/2015 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-937/MUM/2015
Reply to the appeal and the stay application has not been filed by the respondent no. 1. Let the same may be done within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder or on before the next date of hearing.
From the record it appears that respondent no. 2 is yet to be served. The appellant to take the necessary steps to serve him by Registered A.D. Post.
In the meanwhile, in view of the averments made in the stay application the operation of the impugned order dated 31st August, 2015 shall remain stayed till the next date of hearing.
FPA-PMLA-937/MUM/2015
Page 1 of 2
List on 14th February, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh)
Chairman
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 24th November, 2016
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-937/MUM/2015
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether to stay the operation of the impugned order pending the outcome of the stay application.
Whether the respondent has filed a reply and the respondent no. 2 has been served.
Nilesh J. Thakur
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
23 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
