Appeals filed under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act opposed. No reply received from the respondents. Final opportunity granted to the respondents to file a reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1858/CHD/2015 (U/s 39) & FPA-PMLA-936/CHD/2015 Smt. Pritam Kaur … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh … Respondents
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Sh. Bharat Bhusan Jain, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : Sh. S.A. Saud, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
ORDER 24.11.2016
MP-PMLA-1858/CHD/2015 (U/s 39) & FPA-PMLA-936/CHD/2015
Reply has not been filed by the respondent. One final opportunity is granted to counsel for the respondent to file the reply within four weeks with an advance copy to learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter. Interim order to continue.
List on 31st March, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
New Delhi, 24th November, 2016 ‘K’ FPA-PMLA-936/CHD/2015
Page 1 of 1
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Pritam Kaur
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
18 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
Manmohan Singh and G.C. Mishra
Parties & counsel
