A procedural order from the Appellate Tribunal under the PMLA admitting a reply from the respondent and listing the case for further proceedings. The court did not decide the merits of the appeal.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1700/BNG/2015 (Stay) MP-PMLA-1693/BNG/2015 (stay) FPA-PMLA-894/BNG/2015
Dodda Sidappa … Appellant Versus
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri A.A. Kalebudde, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 17.11.2016
FPA-PMLA-894/BNG/2015
The respondent has filed the reply. A copy has been served to the counsel for the appellant, who seeks time to file the rejoinder. Let the same be filed within four weeks.
List on 23rd March, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 17th November, 2016. ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-894/BNG/2015
Page 1 of 1
Dodda Sidappa
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
