Listing order allowing the appellant time to file a written synopsis for hearing the permanency application in FPA-PMLA-856/CHN/2015.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1745/CHN/ 2015 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-856/CHN/2015
Dr. V.M. Ganesan … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Sh. V. Raghavachari, Advocate For the respondent : Sh. S.A. Saud, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER ORDER 01.12.2016
FPA-PMLA-856/CHN/2015
The learned counsel for the appellant made his submissions and
seeks some time to file the written synopsis so that the arguments may be heard.
List on 31st January, 2017 for remaining argument.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 1st December, 2016. ‘D’
FPA-PMLA-856/CHN/2015
Page 1 of 1
Dr. V.M. Ganesan
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
