The Adjudicating Officer of the Appellate Tribunal for PMLA renotied the matter for 6th February 2017 as no one appeared on behalf of the appellant to rebut a cited High Court judgment.
Renotification for re-hearing on 6th February 2017
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1554/HYD/2015 (Stay) MP-PMLA-1555/HYD/2015 (Exemption)
&
FPA-PMLA-832/HYD/2015
Kattekola Nagarjuna Rao … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | None |
|---|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : | Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : | CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : | MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : | MEMBER |
ORDER 18.11.2016
MP-PMLA-1554/HYD/2015 (Stay), MP-PMLA-1555/HYD/2015 (Exemption) FPA-PMLA-832/HYD/2015
This matter is listed for consideration. It appears from the order dated 11th March, 2016 when learned counsel for the appellant sought time to rebut the judgment of Hon’ble Orrisa High Court in the matter CRLMC No. 114 10 CP 2011 dated 16.12.2013. However, when the matter is taken up today, no one appears on behalf of the appellant. In the interest of justice, renotify on 6th February, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 18th November, 2016
‘R’
FPA-PMLA-832/HYD/2015
Page 1 of 1
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the matter should be renotified in the absence of the appellant.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Orrisa High Court in the matter CRLMC No. 114 10 CP 2011 dated 16.12.2013Referred¶10
Kattekola Nagarjuna Rao
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
