The Tribunal fixed a hearing date following a submission regarding payment of costs and a pending challenge before the High Court.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-822/AHD/2015
Samir Godil … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
… Respondent
/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Chetan Pandya, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 30.11.2016
FPA-PMLA-822/AHD/2015
The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the cost has been paid in terms of the order dated 21st July, 2016. It is stated by learned counsel for the appellant that he has challenged the order before the Hon’ble Gujrat High Court against taking cognizance in PMLA case. He further submits that the matter is coming up in the High Court tomorrow and seeks an adjournment, which is not opposed by the learned counsel for the respondent.
List on 20th February, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 30th November, 2016. ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-822/AHD/2015
Page 1 of 1
Samir Godil
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
13 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
