Single opportunity granted to appellant to argue the appeal. In absence of appearance, appeal is likely to be dismissed on next hearing date. Listed for 1st March, 2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1366/LKW/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-757/LKW/2014
Amrendra Kr. Jaiswal … Appellant / Applicant Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : None For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 08.12.2016
FPA-PMLA-757/LKW/2014
No one appears on behalf of the appellant. One final opportunity is granted to the appellant to argue the matter. In absence thereof, the appeal is likely to be dismissed on the next date of hearing.
List on 1st March, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 8th December, 2016 ‘d’
FPA-PMLA-757/LKW/2014
Page 1 of 1
Amrendra Kr. Jaiswal
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
