Adjournment order. The appellate tribunal granted an adjournment in a matter under the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, noting the absence of the co-appellant's counsel in the related case.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1317/LKW/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-704/LKW/2014
Vinay Singh … Appellant / Applicant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Dinesh Agnihotri, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
08.12.2016
FPA-PMLA-704/LKW/2014
The learned counsel for the appellant although ready with the matter request for adjournment since the other counsel did not appear in the related case who is to argue the matter first.
List the matter on 1st March, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 8th December, 2016
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-704/LKW/2014
Page 1 of 1
Vinay Singh
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
2 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
