Appellate Tribunal allowed a last opportunity to the appellant for arguments. Adjournment earlier requested by appellant was not granted. List fixed for 20th March 2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2033/MUM/2015 (Stay) MP-PMLA-1405/MUM/2015 (Stay) MP-PMLA-1406/MUM/2015 (Addl. Evidence) &
FPA-PMLA-669/MUM/2014
Smt. Bonhi Mukharjee … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Ms. Susmita Mahala, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent |
: Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate |
CORAM |
|
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER 17.11.2016
MP-PMLA-2033/MUM/2015 (Stay), MP-PMLA-1405/MUM/2015 (Stay) MP-PMLA-1406/MUM/2015 (Addl. Evidence) & FPA-PMLA669/MUM/2014
The counsel for the appellant seeks an adjournment on the reason that the arguing counsel is in personal difficulty. The request is not opposed by the counsel for the respondent. It has been noticed that on the last date of hearing also, adjournment is taken by the counsel for the appellant. Last opportunity is granted to the counsel for the appellant to address the arguments.
List on 20th March, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 17th November, 2016
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-669/MUM/2014
Page 1 of 1
Smt. Bonhi Mukharjee
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
