No substantive decision rendered. The appeal was adjourned due to non-appearance by the appellant despite a call for submissions. Costs were noted unsatisfied.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1192/AHD/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-660/AHD/2014 Vaishali Patel … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : None For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 24.11.2016
FPA-PMLA-660/AHD/2014
On first call, no one appears on behalf of the appellant. On the last date of hearing an adjournment is taken by the counsel for the appellant. No one appears on behalf of the appellant on second call also. The cost of Rs. 5,000 is yet to be paid by the counsel for the appellant to the counsel for the respondent. The same is paid by the next date. The matter is adjourned to 14th February, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 24th November, 2016 ‘d’
FPA-PMLA-660/AHD/2014
Page 1 of 1
Vaishali Patel
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmedabad
Manmohan Singh
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
