Appeal dismissed in proceedings for Prevention of Money Laundering Act as no appearance was made by the appellant despite repeated adjournments.
Appeal dismissed due to non-appearance of the appellant.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-647/MUM/2014
M/s. Aastha Minmet India Pvt. Ltd. … Applicant/Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : None. For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
16.11.2016
FPA-PMLA-647/MUM/2014
This matter was taken second time, no one appears on behalf of the appellant. We have noticed that many time adjournments have been granted on the request of the appellant in this matter. Therefore, the matter is dismissed.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 16th November, 2016
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-647/MUM/2014
Page 1 of 1
M/s. Aastha Minmet India Pvt. Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
