The Appellate Tribunal adjourned the matter to January 2016, granting the appellant four weeks to file a reply synopsis while the respondent requested adjournment due to unavailability.
The matter was adjourned to January 2016 for filing of the reply within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-1313/CHN/2014 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-564/CHN/2014
| M/s. Mangal Bullion Pvt. Ltd. | … | Appellant |
|---|---|---|
| Versus | ||
| The Joint Director | ||
| Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai | … | Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | Shri P.D. Jain, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : | Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate Shri Manish Jain, Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : | CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : | MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : | MEMBER |
ORDER
13.12.2016
MP-PMLA-1313/CHN/2014 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-564/CHN/2014
The learned counsel for the appellant has concluded his submission. He seeks two weeks time to file the written synopsis. The learned counsel for the respondent states that the concerned officer is not available due to certain circumstances and a short adjournment is requested. Therefore, let the matter be taken up in the month of January, 2016 in the interest of justice. Granted four weeks time to file the reply.
FPA-PMLA-564/CHN/2014
Page 1 of 2
List on 11th January, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava)
Member
(Anand Kishore) Member New Delhi, 13th December, 2016
‘A’
FPA-PMLA-564/CHN/2014
Page 2 of 2
M/s. Mangal Bullion Pvt. Ltd.
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Chennai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
18 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
