The Appellate Tribunal adjourned a matter due to non-appearance of parties following a confusion regarding the hearing date. No substantive decision or legal proposition is rendered.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-536/DLI/2013
Chamundeswarnath … Appellant/Applicant
Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | None |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : | Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate on behalf of Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : | CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : | MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : | MEMBER |
ORDER 18.11.2016
FPA-PMLA-536/DLI/2013
No one appear on behalf of any of the parties. A day before yesterday, the matter was mentioned by the Learned Counsel for the appellant stating that in this matter he had noted the date of hearing as 16th November, however, from the order it appeared to him that it was listed for today. Probably for this reason no one appears on behalf of the parties. In the interest of justice, the matter is adjourned. Statement made by the Learned Counsel for the respondent Mr. Nitish Rana on the last date also continue till the next date.
FPA-PMLA-536/DLI/2013
Page 1 of 2
List on 3rd February, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 18th November, 2016
‘A’
FPA-PMLA-536/DLI/2013
Page 2 of 2
Chamundeswarnath
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
20 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
