This order is a procedural ruling where the Tribunal allowed both parties to file written synopses and documents and listed the appeal for the next hearing. It contains no substantive legal decision or ratio.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-482/DLI/2013
Archana Gupta … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Rahul Thukral, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
| ORDER |
|---|
| 09.12.2016 |
FPA-PMLA-482/DLI/2013
The learned counsel for the appellant stated that he has engaged
very recently and will argument the matter on the next date of hearing.
Both the parties are allowed to file their written synopsis alongwith
compilation of documents on or before the next date of hearing.
List the appeal on 16th February, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 9th December, 2016 ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-482/DLI/2013
Page 1 of 1
Archana Gupta
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
20 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
