Order listing an amended appeal in a Prevention of Money Laundering Act matter. No substantive decision was rendered; the appeal was listed for future hearing and time was given for rejoinder.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-476/BNG/2013
Smt. K.S. Jalaja
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : None For the respondent : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 17.11.2016
FPA-PMLA-476/BNG/2013
The respondent has filed reply to the amended appeal. No one appears on behalf of the appellant. Rejoinder to the amended appeal, if any, be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the respondent.
List on 23rd March, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi,
17th November, 2016.
‘s’
FPA-PMLA-476/BNG/2013 Page 1 of 1
Smt. K.S. Jalaja
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
