This order adjourns proceedings after granting the appellant two weeks to file a reply, with a subsequent two-week period for any rejoinder, noting no further adjournments will likely be granted.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2119/BNG/2015 (Misc.) &
FPA-PMLA-439/BNG/2013
(ECIR/98/BZ/2010, PAO NO-06/2012, OC NO- 153/2012)
The Joint Director … Appellant/Applicant Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore Versus
Shri Nandipi Shrihari & Others
… Respondents
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate For the respondent no. 5 : Shri Kunal Dutta, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 03.11.2016
MP-PMLA-2119/BNG/2015 (Misc.) & FPA-PMLA-439/BNG/2013
Reply has not been filed by the appellant. The counsel for the appellant seeks time to file the reply. Last opportunity is granted to file the reply within two weeks. Rejoinder, if any, be filed within two weeks thereafter. No further adjournment is likely to be granted.
List on 3rd February, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 3rd November, 2016 ‘d’
FPA-PMLA-439/BNG/2013
Page 1 of 1
Directorate of Enforcement
Shri Nandipi Shrihari
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
8 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
