TheFull Bench granted the appellant/another adjournment in a Prevention of Money Laundering Act matter despite the matter being pending for years, allowing them to argue once more.
One final opportunity granted to argue the matter on the next date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-783/DLI/2014 (Misc.) &
FPA-PMLA-333/DLI/2012
D.B. Reality
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Mukesh Sharma, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 10.11.2016
FPA-PMLA-333/DLI/2012
Yet another adjournment is sought on behalf of the appellant mainly on the reasons that the arguing counsel Mr. Vijay Agarwal, is busy in 2G matters. In view of the previous record the matter has been adjourned for last many years. One final opportunity is granted to the appellant to argue the matter on the next date.
List this matter on 23rd February, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 10th November, 2016.
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-333/DLI/2012
Page 1 of 1
D.B. Reality
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
