Appeal kept for hearing. Court directed parties to examine Trial Court record, flag it, and file a compilation of relied-upon documents. Hearing listed for later date.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-220/HYD/2011
A.V. Raghva Raju … Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri R.K. Handoo, Advocate For the Respondent : Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 14.12.2016
FPA-PMLA-220/HYD/2011
This matter is kept for hearing today.
The learned counsel for both the parties seek time to examine the Trial Court record and flag the same on or before the next date of hearing. Both the parties submit that they will also try to file the compilation of documents which are relied upon by them which during the course of
hearing.
Let the needful be done. Also three sets of the compilation be prepared and filed so that matter can be heard on merits.
List on 21st February, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 14th December, 2016
‘s’
FPA-PMLA-220/HYD/2011
Page 1 of 1
A.V. Raghva Raju
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
14 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
