The Appellate Tribunal directed both parties to submit written submissions and document compilations relied upon before the Adjudicating Authority, listing the matter for hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-338/LKW/2011 FPA-PMLA-177/LKW/2011
M/s Kolhan Trading Pvt. Ltd.
… Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Imran Alam, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
04.11.2016
MP-PMLA-338/LKW/2011 & FPA-PMLA-177/LKW/2011
Both the parties are allowed to bring the written submission along with compilation of documents which were relied upon by the parties before the Adjudicating Authority and are required for the purpose of hearing of the Appeal on or, if already not filed, before the next date of hearing.
List the matter on 17th February, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 4th November, 2016 ‘R’
FPA-PMLA-177/LKW/2011
Page 1 of 1
M/s Kolhan Trading Pvt. Ltd.
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
