Disposed

FPA-PMLA-1514/KOL/2016 of Sanjukta Vohra v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

ATFP28 Nov 2016FPA-PMLA-1514/KOL/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Appellate Tribunal admitted the appeal filed under Section 26 of the PMLA and listed it for hearing. The Tribunal granted liberty to the appellant to approach for interim order if the respondent issues a notice under Section 8(4) of the PMLA.

What did the court decide?

Allowed time for reply and granted liberty to approach for interim order if notice under Section 8(4) is issued.

FPA-PMLA-1514/KOL/2016 of Sanjukta Vohra v/s The Deputy Director… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2016)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-2855/KOL/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1514/KOL/2016

¶3

Sanjukta Vohra … Appellant

¶4

Versus

¶5

The Deputy Director

¶6

Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

¶7

… Respondent

¶8

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶9

For the appellant	: Shri Nitin Sangra, Advocate Ms. Sonia Dube, Advocate
For the respondent	: Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH	: CHAIRMAN
SHRI G.C. MISHRA	: MEMBER

¶10

ORDER 28.11.2016

¶11

FPA-PMLA-1514/KOL/2016

¶12

The appellant has filed the appeal under Section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 against the order dated 16^th September, 2016 passed by the Adjudicating Authority under Section 8 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 in O.C. No. 603/2016. The learned counsel for the respondent accepts the notice who seeks sometime to file the reply. Let the same be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.

¶13

List this appeal on 2^nd February, 2017.

¶14

MP-PMLA-2855/KOL/2016 (Stay)

¶15

The Counsel for the appellant has pressing for interim order. Issue notice of the application, the learned counsel for the respondent accepts notice and seeks time to file the reply. Reply be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.

¶16

FPA-PMLA-1514/KOL/2016

¶17

Page 1 of 2

¶18

The learned counsel for the respondent submits that the notice under Section 8(4) PMLA 2002 for many accounts has not been issued and unless notice is issued, no further action/steps are likely to be taken. Liberty is granted to the appellant to approach this Tribunal to press interim order if any notice under Section 8(4) PMLA 2002 is issued by the respondent.

¶19

List this application on 2^nd February, 2017.

¶20

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶21

(G.C. Mishra) Member

¶22

New Delhi, 28^th November, 2016

¶23

‘A’

¶24

FPA-PMLA-1514/KOL/2016

¶25

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1514/KOL/2016 of Sanjukta Vohra v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1514/KOL/2016 of Sanjukta Vohra v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases