The Tribunal allowed the appellant's request for condonation of delay under section 5 of the Limitation Act while pending an appeal under section 26 of the PMLA. An application for a reply to the notice was also allowed.
Prayer for condonation of delay allowed; notice issued to respondent.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2849/DLI/2016 (COD) FPA-PMLA-1508/DLI/2016
Roma agarwal … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant : |
Shri Malay Dwivedi, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent : |
Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER
25.11.2016
MP-PMLA-2849/DLI/2016 (COD) & FPA-PMLA-1508./DLI/2016
Fresh appeal has been filed by the appellant under section 26 of
the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002. Along with the appeal, the appellant has filed an application under section 5 of Limitation Act to condone delay in filing the appeal. The same is not opposed by the respondent. The prayer for condonation of delay is allowed. Issue notice to the respondent. Mr. Atul Tripathi, learned counsel for the respondent accepts notice and seeks time to file the reply. Let the reply be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter. List this appeal on 2nd March, 2017.
FPA-PMLA-1508/DLI/2016
Page 1 of 2
The learned counsel for the appellant has pointed out and we have noticed that the order dated 8th August, 2016 passed by Hon’ble High Court wherein it has been ordered that any order passed by the Adjudicating Authority shall not be given effect until further orders.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra)
Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi,
25th November, 2016
‘R’
FPA-PMLA-1508/DLI/2016
Page 2 of 2
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appeal filed under section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act was within the limitation period.
Whether the application for condonation of delay be allowed.
2 provisions across 2 enactments
Roma Agarwal
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
12 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
