Timeline order regarding properties under FEMA/PMLA in Mumbai. Accepted notice of appeal and application, listed matter, and continued interim order dated October 7, 2016.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2813/MUM/2016 (Stay)
&
| FPA-PMLA-1491/MUM/2016 | |
|---|---|
| SRB Developers | … Appellant/Applicant |
| Versus | |
| The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai |
… Respondent |
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Gurmehar S. Sistani, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Neeraj Atri, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER
19.10.2016
MP-PMLA-2813/MUM/2016 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1491/MUM/2016
As the respondent seeks further four weeks time to take the instructions in view of the order passed on 7th October, 2016. The notice of the appeal as well as the application is accepted on behalf of respondent no. 4. The counsel states that reply is not necessary on behalf of his client. Let the notice be issued to respondent no. 2 & 3. In the meanwhile the appeal as well as in the pending application the appellant will take the necessary steps in this regard.
List the matter on 24th November, 2016.
FPA-PMLA-1491/MUM/2016
Page 1 of 2
Interim order passed on 7th October, 2016 shall continue.
(Justice Manmohan Singh)
Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava)
Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 19th October, 2016
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1491/MUM/2016
Page 2 of 2
SRB Developers
The Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
19 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
