FPA-PMLA-1485/MUM/2016 of Oriental Bank of Commerce v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Case brief
What is this about?
Oriental Bank of Commerce V/s The Deputy…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2808/MUM/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1485/MUM/2016
Oriental Bank of Commerce … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri H.P. Bhardwaj, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA |
: CHAIRMAN : MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
| ORDER | |
| 2 | 4.10.2016 |
MP-PMLA-2808/MUM/2016 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1485/MUM/2016
Issue notice to the respondent. Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate counsel for
the appellant accepts the notice and seeks time to file the reply. Reply be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant, who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter. The counsel for the respondent submits that to the best of his knowledge so far no notice for taking over possession has been issued in the matter.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Oriental Bank of Commerce
- respondent
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Coram
Manmohan Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
15 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court