The Appellate Tribunal, Prevention of Money Laundering Act, accepted the respondent's notice under Section 26 of the PMLA 2002 and granted six weeks to file a reply, with four weeks for a rejoinder.
Notice accepted; time granted for reply (6 weeks) and rejoinder (4 weeks).
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1446/JL/2016
Sarabjit Singh … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Gurjinder Singh, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Neeraj Atri, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER
28.10.2016
FPA-PMLA-1446/JL/2016
The appeal has been filed under section 26 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 against the order dated 8th July, 2016. Issue notice to the respondent. The counsel for the respondent accepts the notice and seeks time to file the reply. Let the reply be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 10th March, 2016.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 28th October, 2016 ‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1446/JL/2016
Page 1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sarabjit Singh
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
