Partly allowed

FPA-PMLA-1444/KOL/2016 of M3M Corporate India Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata

ATFP19 Oct 2016FPA-PMLA-1444/KOL/2016

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Tribunal allowed condonation of a 54-day delay in filing an appeal. It listed an interim stay application for notices and mentioned listing an appeal under PMLA for February 2017.

What did the court decide?

Condonation of delay of 54 days in filing appeal allowed; appeal listed for hearing on 15th February, 2017.

What the court decided

FPA-PMLA-1444/KOL/2016 of M3M Corporate India Ltd. v/s The Deputy… — Money Laundering | ATFP (2016)

¶1

APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI

¶2

MP-PMLA-2733/KOL/2016 (COD) MP-PMLA-2734/KOL/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1444/KOL/2016

¶3

M3M Corporate India Ltd. … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … Respondent

¶4

… Respondent

¶5

Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared

¶6

For the appellant	: Shri Rajat Bhardwaj, Advocate
For the respondent	: Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH	: CHAIRMAN
SHRI G.C. MISHRA	: MEMBER
SHRI B.K. BANSAL	: MEMBER

¶7

ORDER 19.10.2016

¶8

MP-PMLA-2733/KOL/2016 (COD)

¶9

This is an application filed by the applicant for condonation of delay of 54 days in filing the appeal. The application is supported by medical documents in relation to the averments made in the para no. 2 to 8 of the application. The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent states that there is no doubt that the application is supported by the medical documents. He submits that the application be decided by the Tribunal. Reading the averments made in para no. 2 to 8 in a meaningful manner, it is noticed that there is sufficient cause explaining the delay in filing the present appeal. In these circumstances, the prayer made in the application is allowed and delay of 54 days in filing the appeal is condoned. The application is disposed of.

¶10

FPA-PMLA-1444/KOL/2016

¶11

Page 1 of 2

¶12

MP-PMLA-2734/KOL/2016 (Stay)

¶13

Issue notice. the counsel for the respondent seeks four weeks time to file the reply. Let the same be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.

¶14

List on 15^th February, 2017.

¶15

FPA-PMLA-1444/KOL/2016

¶16

The appellant has filed this appeal under section 26 of PMLA, 2002 against the order dated 9^th May, 2016 passed by the Adjudicating Authority in O.C. NO. 545/2016. The counsel for the appellant submits that neither new ground has been taken in the appeal nor additional documents have been filed, in view of above, counsel for respondent says that the reply is not necessary.

¶17

List the appeal on 15^th February, 2017.

¶18

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶19

(G.C. Mishra) Member

¶20

(B.K. Bansal) Member

¶21

New Delhi,

¶22

19^th October, 2016

¶23

‘d’

¶24

FPA-PMLA-1444/KOL/2016

¶25

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1444/KOL/2016 of M3M Corporate India Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

FPA-PMLA-1444/KOL/2016 of M3M Corporate India Ltd. v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases