FPA-PMLA-1435/JP /2016 of Surendra Kumar Sharma v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal filed under Section 26 of PMLA, 2002 confirming provisional attachment. Condonation of delay allowed; appeal notice issued.
What did the court decide?
The application for condonation of delay is allowed. Notice of appeal is issued to the respondent.
What the court decided
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2720/JP/2016 (COD) FPA-PMLA-1435/JP /2016
Surendra Kumar Sharma … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Rajeev Awasthi, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent |
: Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 26.10.2016
MP-PMLA-2720/JP/2016 (COD)
The appellant has filed the appeal u/s 26 of the PML Act 2002 arising out from the order dated 2nd May, 2016 whereby the Adjudicating Authority has confirmed the provisional attachment order in O.C. 283/2014.
Alongwith the appeal, the appellant has filed an application for condonation of delay. The reasons for the delay was given in para 3 to 8 in the application. The respondent is not opposing the same. For the reasons stated in the application, the application is allowed and delay is condoned. The application is accordingly disposed of.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Surendra Kumar Sharma
- respondent
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur
Coram
Manmohan Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · October
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1435/JP /2016
- Topic
- Money Laundering
All orders in this case
2 orders share this CNR
- Order 1 — this page
- Order 2
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court