Respondent order issued on 19.10.2016 ordering respondent authorities to reply to an application filed by the appellant.
Direction to respondent to file reply
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2701/HYD/2016 (COD)
&
FPA-PMLA-1426/HYD/2015
State Bank of India … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri S.L. Gupta, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Neeraj Atri, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
ORDER 19.10.2016
MP-PMLA-2701/HYD/2016 (COD)
This is an application filed by the appellant who has also filed the appeal under section 26 of the Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 challenging the order dated 20th October, 2015. In the present application the prayer is made by the appellant to condone the delay of eight months in filing the appeal.
The learned counsel for the respondent is opposing the prayer made in the application. Issue notice to the respondent. Let the reply be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder thereafter.
FPA-PMLA-1426/HYD/2015
Page 1 of 2
Notice of this application may also be issued to respondent no. 2 to
FPA-PMLA-1426/HYD/2015
List the appeal on 16th January, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi,
19th October, 2016
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1426/HYD/2015
Page 2 of 2
State Bank of India
The Joint Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
7 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
