Appendix or procedural order in PMLA cases granting one final opportunity to the respondent to file a reply against an application without a substantive decision on merits.
Procedural order listing ongoing Prevention of Money Laundering Act matters. Only an administrative direction to the respondent to file a reply within six weeks was issued. No decision on the merits or disposition of the core applications was rendered in this document.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2681/LKW/2016 (COD) MP-PMLA-2682/LKW/2016 (Exemp.) MP-PMLA-2683/LKW/2016 (Stay)
&
FPA-PMLA-1424/LKW/2016
Dehat Stapana Nyvas … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondent
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | Shri Abhey Pandey, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent | : | Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate |
| CORAM | ||
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : | CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : | MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : | MEMBER |
ORDER
09.12.2016
MP-PMLA-2681/LKW/2016 (COD)
Reply has not been filed. One final opportunity is granted to the respondent to file reply within six weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file rejoinder four weeks thereafter.
List on 3rd April, 2017.
FPA-PMLA-1424/LKW/2016
Page 1 of 2
FPA-PMLA-1424/LKW/2016
Renotify for 3rd April, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member New Delhi, 9th December, 2016 ‘R’
FPA-PMLA-1424/LKW/2016
Page 2 of 2
Dehat Stapana Nyvas
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
16 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
