An interlocutory order in the Prevention of Money Laundering Act proceedings granting six weeks to the respondent to file a reply to the notice, allowing time for a rejoinder.
Notice issued; six weeks granted to respondent for reply.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2658/DLI/2016 FPA-PMLA-1420/DLI/2016
Anju Chaturvedi … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Mukesh Sharma, Advocate For the respondent : Shri James P. Thomas, Advocate on behalf of Shri Shaijan C. George, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 21.10.2016
MP-PMLA-2658/DLI/2016 & FPA-PMLA-1420/DLI/2016
Issue notice to the respondent. Shri James P. Thomas, learned counsel for the respondent accepts notice and seeks time to file the reply. Let the same may be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four
weeks thereafter.
List on 22nd February, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 21st October, 2016 ‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1420/DLI/2016
Page 1 of 1
Anju Chaturvedi
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
15 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
