The Appellate Tribunal granted one final opportunity to the respondent to file a reply to the stay application, with provisions for a rejoinder if raised. It subsequently listed the matter for hearing on 30th March, 2017.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2772/JL/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1384/JL/2016
Sandeep Kaur … Appellant/Applicant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Ms.Akshita Goyal, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate
CORAM JUSTICE MAN MOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER
16.11.2016
FPA-PMLA-1384/JL/2016 & MP-PMLA-2772/JL/2016 (Stay)
Reply has not been filed. One final opportunity is granted to file the
reply within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder, if necessary, within four weeks thereafter.
Copy of the order be given ‘ dasti’ to both the parties.
List on 30th March, 2017.
(Justice Man Mohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 16th November, 2016.
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1384/JL/2016
Page 1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sandeep Kaur
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jalandhar
Man Mohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
11 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
