This appeal application was listed before the Mappillai-PMLA bench, but no substantive order disposing of the matter was recorded. The court merely allowed the respondent to file a reply, directing adjournment for a rejoinder.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2774/DDN/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1382/DDN/2016
Satish Kumar Sharma & anr. … Appellants/Applicants Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Dehradun … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellants | : Shri Harikesh Singh, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the Respondent | : Shri S.K. Sharma, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 16.12.2016
FPA-PMLA-1382/DDN/2016
Reply has not been filed by the respondent. The learned counsel for
the respondent submits that appellant no. 1 has been convicted in the criminal matter and he will be filing the copy of the order along with the reply. Let the reply be filed within four weeks. Rejoinder be filed four weeks thereafter.
List on 2nd March, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 16th December, 2016. ‘R’
FPA-PMLA-1382/DDN/2016
Page 1 of 1
Satish Kumar Sharma
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Dehradun
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
