The Appellate Tribunal noted that a reply was filed by the respondent but no rejoinder was filed by the appellant, directing it to be filed within six weeks and listing the matter for connection with approximates.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2716/DLI/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1345/DLI/2016
Gurucharan Singh … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondents
… Respondents
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellants : Mr. Harshit Sethi, Advocate Mr. Gulshan Kumar, Advocate For the respondent : Shri N.K. Matta, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 09.12.2016
FPA-PMLA-1345/DLI/2016
Reply has been filed by the respondent. No rejoinder is filed by the
appellant. Let the same be filed within six weeks.
List this matter on 19th May, 2017 when connected appeals are
coming up.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 9th December, 2016 ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1345/DLI/2016
Page 1 of 1
Gurucharan Singh
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
