FPA-PMLA-1343/DLI/2016 of Mahamedha Urban C0-Operative Bank v/s The Financial Intelligent Unit-India

Reply to the appeal and stay application has not been filed by the respondent. Counsel seeks some more time to file the same. Learned counsel for the appellant has no objection. However, he is pressing for interim order. Let the replies be filed within six weeks with an advance copy to the learned counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.

¶13

List on 22^nd March, 2017.

¶14

As far as interim prayer is concerned, after small hearing and in view of the averment made in para-5 of stay application subject to deposit of FDR (initially for the period of the years) for an amount of Rs. 3 lakhs with respondent no. 1 within four weeks from today, the

¶15

FPA-PMLA-1343/DLI/2016 Page 1 of 2

¶16

impugned order dated 8th April, 2016 shall remain stayed qua the present applicant till the next date of hearing.

¶17

(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman

¶18

(Kaushal Srivastava) Member

¶19

(Anand Kishore) Member

¶20

New Delhi, 16^th November, 2016

¶21

‘d’

¶22

FPA-PMLA-712/LKW/2014

¶23

Page 2 of 2

FPA-PMLA-1343/DLI/2016 of Mahamedha Urban C0-Operative Bank v/s The Financial Intelligent Unit-India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

FPA-PMLA-1343/DLI/2016 of Mahamedha Urban C0-Operative Bank v/s The Financial Intelligent Unit-India

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

All orders in this case

Similar cases