FPA-PMLA-1340/DLI/2016 of Aditi Kalra v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Case brief
What is this about?
Appeal adjourned to a later date on account of a clerical error in the order recording the date of listing; none of the respondent appeared.
What the court decided
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2589/DLI/2016(u/s 26) MP-PMLA-2590/DLI/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1340/DLI/2016
Aditi Kalra … Appellant
Versus
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri R.K. Handoo, Advocate For the respondent : None CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 17.10.2016
FPA-PMLA-1340/DLI/2016
The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the matter is listed on 17th November, 2016. But, inadvertently the date of posting has been typed as 17th October, 2016 in the last order. In view of the above the appeal is adjourned to 17th November, 2016. None appeared on behalf of the respondent.
Parties & counsel
- appellant
Aditi Kalra
- respondent
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Delhi
Coram
Justice Manmohan Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · October
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1340/DLI/2016
- Topic
- Money Laundering
All orders in this case
13 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court