Adjournment order allowing the respondent time to file a reply in FPA-PMLA-1306/MUM/2016; matter listed for future hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1306/MUM/2016
Kumar Taurani … Appellant
Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Shri Sanjay Chadha, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Shaijan C. George, Advocate
CORAM
JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER
10.11.2016
FPA-PMLA-1306/MUM/2016
The counsel for the respondent seeks three weeks time to file the reply. Let the reply be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 9th January, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore)
Member
New Delhi, 10th November, 2016
‘d’
FPA-PMLA-1306/MUM/2016 Page 1 of 1
Kumar Taurani
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Mumbai
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
