FPA-PMLA-1295/BNG/2016 of M.B. Vikram v/s The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Case brief
What is this about?
M.B. Vikram V/s The Deputy Director…
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1295/BNG/2016
M.B. Vikram … Applicant/Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : | Shri Susheel Joseph, Advocate |
|---|---|---|
| For the respondent |
: | Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH SHRI G.C. MISHRA |
: : |
CHAIRMAN MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : | MEMBER |
| ORDER | ||
| 17.11.2016 |
FPA-PMLA-1295/BNG/2016
On last date of hearing, time was granted to the appellant to verify the defects and remove it. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that he has filed his Vakalatnama as well as the affidavit by speed post. However, the said are not tagged with the file. The learned counsel for the appellant is directed to approach the registry and get them and placed the same on record today itself.
FPA-PMLA-1295/BNG/2016
Parties & counsel
- appellant
M.B. Vikram
- respondent
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Coram
Manmohan Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
All orders in this case
14 orders share this CNR
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court