FPA-PMLA-1288/CHD/2016 of Pritam Kaur v/s The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh
Case brief
What is this about?
Appellate Tribunal re-notified an appeal (FPA-PMLA-1288/CHD/2016) presented as an order, not disposing of the matter.
Appellate Tribunal re-notified an appeal (FPA-PMLA-1288/CHD/2016) presented as an order, not disposing of the matter.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP- PMLA-2551/CHD/2016(U/s 151) MP- PMLA-2552/CHD/2016 (COD) FPA-PMLA-1288/CHD/2016
Pritam Kaur … Applicant/Appellant
Versus
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh
… Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Ms. Bharat Bhushan Jain, Advocate For the respondent : Shri S.A. Saud, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER
ORDER
24.11.2016
MP- PMLA-2552/CHD/2016 (COD)
In the above mentioned application has been filed by the Appellant for condonation of delay. The Learned counsel for the respondent states that he would argue the matter without reply. He further submits that copy of the additional affidavit in support of the application for condonation of delay has been received yesterday only.
List on 31st March, 2017.
MP- PMLA-2551/CHD/2016 (U/s 151)
Reply has been filed. Learned counsel for the respondent submits
that he would argue the application without reply.
FPA-PMLA-1288/CHD/2016
Re-notified this appeal.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member New Delhi, 24th November, 2016 ‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1288/CHD/2016
Page 1 of 1
Pritam Kaur
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Chandigarh
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
10 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court