Procedural listing orders regarding the filing of reply and rejoinder, and submission of written synopses in the referenced PMLA cases. No substantive adjudication.
Time granted for filing rejoinder within four weeks; synopses allowed by next hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2546/LKW/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1283/LKW/2016 Smt. Rajni Jain … Appellant/Applicant Versus The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Yoginder Handoo, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent |
: Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER
30.11.2016
FPA-PMLA-1279/LKW/2016
The learned counsel for the respondent submits that the reply is ready and he would file the same during the course of the day. A copy of the same has been handed over to the counsel for the appellant today in the court room itself, who seeks time to file the rejoinder. Let the same be filed within four weeks.
List on 16th January, 2017.
FPA-PMLA-1283/LKW/2016
Page 1 of 2
Both the parties are allowed to file the written synopsis on or before
the next date of hearing.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi,
30th November, 2016.
‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1283/LKW/2016
Page 2 of 2
Smt. Rajni Jain
The Joint Director Directorate of Enforcement, Lucknow
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
19 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
