The Appellate Tribunal allowed additional time for the appellant to file a rejoinder and required both parties to submit written synopses by the next date, listing the matter for further proceedings.
Extension of four weeks for filing rejoinder; direction to file written synopsis.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
MP-PMLA-2433/JP/2016 (Stay) FPA-PMLA-1258/JP/2016
Shiv Narayan Joshi … Appellant/ Applicant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Mr. Davinder N. Grover, Advocate For the respondent : Mr. N.K. Matta, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 18.11.2016
MP-PMLA-2433/JP/2016 (Stay) & FPA-PMLA-1258/JP/2016
The rejoinder has not been filed by the appellant. The Learned Counsel for the appellant seeks some more time due to personal difficulties with the counsel. Let the same be filed within four weeks as last opportunity. Both the parties are also to file the written synopsis on or before the next date.
List on 9th March, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 18th November, 2016 ‘A’
FPA-PMLA-1258/JP/2016
Page 1 of 1
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the appellant requires an extension of time to file the rejoinder and written synopsis.
Whether the matter should be listed for the next date.
Shiv Narayan Joshi
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Jaipur
Manmohan Singh
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
