The Appellate Tribunal granted the respondent one final opportunity to file a reply. The appellant's counsel requested that papers from a related appeal be read together. The matter was listed for future proceedings.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1254/BNG/2016
Smt. Bharati Alias Bhowramma … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondents
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellants : Mr. Chidananda URS, Advocat For the respondent : Shri Atual Tripathi, Advocate on behalf of Ms. Shilpi Satyapriya Satyam, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI G.C. MISHRA : MEMBER SHRI B.K. BANSAL : MEMBER
ORDER 02.11.2016
FPA-PMLA-1254/BNG/2016
Reply has not been filed. One final opportunity is granted to the respondent to file the reply within three weeks. Rejoinder be filed within two weeks thereafter. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the complete set of papers have been filed in the appeal no. FPAPMLA/1257/BNG/2016 and the same be read in this present appeal also as it arising out of same order.
List on 9th December, 2016.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 2nd November, 2016 ‘K’
FPA-PMLA-1254/BNG/2016
Page 1 of 1
Bharati Alias Bhowramma
Deputy Director, Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
22 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
