Appellant requested supply of rejoinder by respondent. Tribunal noted pleadings were complete and listed matter for next hearing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1226/KOL/2016 Gautam Kundu … Applicant/Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Shri Samiron Borkataky, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Vikas Garg, Advocate |
| CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH |
: CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 17.11.2016
FPA-PMLA-1226/KOL/2016
It is informed by the learned counsel by learned counsel for the respondent that the copy of the rejoinder has not been served to him. The learned counsel for the appellant submits that the same be supplied within one week.
The pleadings are complete.
List on 23rd March, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(B.K. Bansal) Member New Delhi, 17th November, 2016. ‘s’
FPA-PMLA-1226/KOL/2016
Page 1 of 1
Gautam Kundu
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Kolkata
Manmohan Singh
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
