Appeal filed under Section 26 of PMLA 2002. No substantive decision recorded in this order; issues notice to respondent and grants time to file reply.
Notice issued to respondent; time granted to file reply within four weeks.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1204/BNG/2016
T. Basavaraju … Applicant/Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Bangalore … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
| For the appellant | : Mr. Susheel, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Nitesh Rana, Advocate Shri Manish Jain, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI G.C. MISHRA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI B.K. BANSAL | : MEMBER |
ORDER 15.12.2016
FPA-PMLA-1204/BNG/2016
The appellant has filed Vakalatnama as well as affidavit. The same is taken on record. The fresh appeal has been filed by the appellant under section 26 of Prevention of Money Laundering Act, 2002 against the impugned order. Issue notice to the respondent. The learned counsel for the respondent accepts the same and seeks time to file the reply. Let the reply be filed within four weeks with an advance copy to the counsel for the appellant who may file the rejoinder within four weeks thereafter.
List on 6th April, 2017.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(G.C. Mishra) Member
(B.K. Bansal) Member
New Delhi, 15th December, 2016. ‘D’
FPA-PMLA-1204/BNG/2016
Page 1 of 1
1 provisions across 1 enactments
T. Basavaraju
Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement
Manmohan Singh
G.C. Mishra
B.K. Bansal
As recorded by the court registry
6 orders share this CNR
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
