Single-page order granting adjournment to appellant citing unavailability of counsel, listing matter for future date. No substantive decision on merits recorded. This order is procedural.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
FPA-PMLA-1185/HYD/2015
Naga Krishna Transport Comp. Employees … Appellant Versus The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad … Respondent
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
For the appellant : Ms. Priti Kumari, Advocate For the respondent : Shri Neeraj Atri, Advocate CORAM JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH : CHAIRMAN SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA : MEMBER SHRI ANAND KISHORE : MEMBER
ORDER 05.10.2016
FPA-PMLA-1185/HYD/2015
Ms. Priti Kumari, Advocate appearing on behalf of learned counsel
for the appellant submits that arguing counsel is not available. She seeks
an adjournment which is not opposed on behalf of the respondent.
List the matter on 16th January, 2017.
In the meanwhile the appellant is granted four weeks time to file
rejoinder.
(Justice Manmohan Singh) Chairman
(Kaushal Srivastava) Member
(Anand Kishore) Member
New Delhi, 5th October, 2016
‘R’
FPA-PMLA-1185/HYD/2015
Page 1 of 1
Naga Krishna Transport Comp. Employees
The Deputy Director Directorate of Enforcement, Hyderabad
Manmohan Singh
Kaushal Srivastava
Anand Kishore
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
