FPA-PMLA-1176/AHD/2016 of Chirag Parikh v/s The Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmadabad
ATFPFPA-PMLA-1176/AHD/2016
Case brief
from the order text
What is this about?
Chirag Parikh V/s The Assistant Director…
What did the court decide?
Reply filed within six weeks; rejoinder by next hearing.
What the court decided
AI extract
¶1
APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT AT NEW DELHI
¶2
FPA-PMLA-1176/AHD/2016
¶3
Chirag Parikh … Appellant
¶4
Versus
¶5
The Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmadabad … Respondent
¶6
Advocates/Authorized Representatives who appeared
¶7
| For the appellant | : Shri Parmatma Singh, Advocate Shri Mayank Jain, Advocate |
|---|---|
| For the respondent | : Shri Atul Tripathi, Advocate |
| CORAM | |
| JUSTICE MANMOHAN SINGH | : CHAIRMAN |
| SHRI KAUSHAL SRIVASTAVA | : MEMBER |
| SHRI ANAND KISHORE | : MEMBER |
¶8
ORDER 11.11.2016
¶9
FPA-PMLA-1176/AHD/2016
¶10
Reply has not been filed by the respondent. One final opportunity is granted to file reply within six weeks. Rejoinder, if any, be filed by the next date of hearing.
Parties & counsel
AI extract
- appellant
Chirag Parikh
- respondent
The Assistant Director Directorate of Enforcement, Ahmadabad
Coram
AI extract
Manmohan Singh
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- ATFP
- Decided on
- · November
- Case no.
- FPA-PMLA-1176/AHD/2016
- Topic
- Money Laundering
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court